BHOLA KUMAR NAME WALLPAPER
This was also not disputed by Counsel appearing for the appellants and the State before us. The suspicion entertained by the defence, in the facts and circumstances noticed above, is fully justified. The other deceased was a resident of their locality as admitted by PW 2. It is established on record that Nagendra Singh deceased was the maternal uncle of PW 2 and the paternal uncle of PW 5. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3. In fact it would support the defence case that the occurrence took place elsewhere, may be at any place further north of the house of Omprakash from where it was brought and parked at the place of occurrence. There is also no consistency in the prosecution evidence as to when the fardbeyan was recorded.
|License:||For Personal Use Only|
|iPhone 5, 5S resolutions||640×1136|
|iPhone 6, 6S resolutions||750×1334|
|iPhone 7, 7 Plus, 8, 8 Plus resolutions||1080×1920|
|Android Mobiles HD resolutions||360×640, 540×960, 720×1280|
|Android Mobiles Full HD resolutions||1080×1920|
|Mobiles HD resolutions||480×800, 768×1280|
|Mobiles QHD, iPhone X resolutions||1440×2560|
|HD resolutions||1280×720, 1366×768, 1600×900, 1920×1080, 2560×1440, Original|
It was submitted that admittedly one of the accused Nawal Kishore Singh was not known to either of the eye-witnesses. In such a situation, if the case was instituted kujar FIR recorded at 4.
It, however, appears from Ext. The shot was fired from a small pistol, but he could not say whether that was a revolver or a country-made weapon. In his examination-in-chief, this witness did not state that the house of Omprakash was surrounded by the witnesses and the kkmar of the locality who had assembled on alarm being raised.
The notice of this witness was drawn to column No. He took out a small country-made pistol from the pocket of his paijama and entered the cabin of the truck from the gate from kumad Kali Pado Chakraborty had got down.
Wound of entry on dissection, left nname lacerated, right lung pale and collapsed, thorasic cavity contained blood heart-both chambers empty, brain-pale, liver-pale, spleen-pale, kidneys-pale, stomach-undigested food, bladder-empty. This fact has also been noticed by the trial Court.
According to this witness, he arrested appellant Sheo Sankar Prasad at 8. PW 5 asked his uncle, Nagendra Singh to leave that place, but Nagendra Singh refused to leave his master alone and asked them also to stay there. He made a statement before the police which was recorded and he signed that statement. All the three accused were arrested by him at different times from their respective houses.
Deceased Nagendra Singh was also his maternal uncle. From the deposition of PW 5, it appears that after the arrival of the police the Investigating Officer made enquiries from him, whereafter he searched the house of Omprakash from where Bhola Kumar was kjmar. In fact PW 5 has gone to the extent of saying kummar even on the return of the accused persons at 1. Additional taxes may apply.
Bhola Kumar Das | Department of Police, State Government of Jharkhand, India
The appellants in Criminal Appeal Nos. It is the case of the prosecution that the Petrol Pump in question where heated exchanges took place is on the main National Highway No. PW 5, the informant however has stated that at about 5 or 6 a.
This only strengthens the criticism levelled by the defence that Jitendra Parmar kept himself behind the scene and pulled strings without himself coming into the picture. He neither knew him from before nor could he identify him by face. The prosecution story oumar two shots were fired at Nagendra Singh only strengthens the suspicion that the eye-witnesses having not seen the occurrence were made to say so since there were two injuries on the dead body of Nagendra Singh.
There is also intrinsic evidence to show that the fardbeyan had been prepared after consultation and due deliberations and was not the true version disclosed by the informant; otherwise the name of Nawal Kishore Singh, who was not known to either of the eye-witnesses, would not have found mention in the fardbeyan.
Even the Investigating Officer found that there were shops near about the Petrol Station.
Even that was not done and the witnesses kept waiting at the place of occurrence till such time as the dead bodies were removed for post-mortem examination which was sent at about 7 or 8 a. If the evidence on record is carefully examined and analysed, many inconsistencies in the prosecution case will be revealed, and having regard to the infirmities in the prosecution case that will appear on a critical scrutiny of the evidence on record, this Court must hold that the prosecution case has not been established beyond reasonable doubt.
BHOLA KUMAR, User profile from India, trade member of Delhi
PW 7 deposed that he had inquest reports with him at the time of holding post-mortem bhkla, but by mistake in the nhola report he mentioned the name of the deceased as Nageshwar Singh instead of Nagendra Singh. PW 3 stated that he was called to the place of occurrence much after the occurrence but he did not know anything about the occurrence.
On hearing the sound of firing, Kali Pado Chakraborty deceased started running towards the west. He deposed that he was on patrol duty that night.
Admittedly none of them fired at the deceased and in fact no overt act is alleged against them. According to PW 2, his house was at a distance of about yards from the house of Nagendra Singh deceased.
Supreme Court Of India21 Apr Though the wound of entry in such cases should have been found on the back, the possibility could no be ruled out that while being chased the deceased turned round to look back on his chaser, and may have been shot at that very time. It is necessary to critically scrutinise their evidence before accepting the same as truthful.